Cited by 328Radiation Therapy and DosimetryEffects of Radiation ExposureSpaceflight effects on biology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Space Radiation Cancer Risks and Uncertainties for Mars Missions

Abstract

Projecting cancer risks from exposure to space radiation is highly uncertain because of the absence of data for humans and because of the limited radiobiology data available for estimating late effects from the high-energy and charge (HZE) ions present in the galactic cosmic rays (GCR). Cancer risk projections involve many biological and physical factors, each of which has a differential range of uncertainty due to the lack of data and knowledge. We discuss an uncertainty assessment within the linear-additivity model using the approach of Monte Carlo sampling from subjective error distributions that represent the lack of knowledge in each factor to quantify the overall uncertainty in risk projections. Calculations are performed using the space radiation environment and transport codes for several Mars mission scenarios. This approach leads to estimates of the uncertainties in cancer risk projections of 400-600% for a Mars mission. The uncertainties in the quality factors are dominant. Using safety standards developed for low-Earth orbit, long-term space missions (>90 days) outside the Earth's magnetic field are currently unacceptable if the confidence levels in risk projections are considered. Because GCR exposures involve multiple particle or delta-ray tracks per cellular array, our results suggest that the shape of the dose response at low dose rates may be an additional uncertainty for estimating space radiation risks.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0682:srcrau]2.0.co;2

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Cucinotta, F. A., Schimmerling, W., Wilson, J. W., Peterson, L. E., Badhwar, G. D., Saganti, P. B., & Dicello, J. F.
Affiliations
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
  • Langley Research Center (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Johnson Space Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Cucinotta, Francis A.
Venue
Radiation Research
Published
2001-11
Volume
156
Issue
5
Pages
682-688
ISSN
  • 0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5404
OpenAlex
W2173229798
Cited by
328
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
11.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Spaceflight effects on biology
Keywords
space radiation, cancer risk, Mars missions, galactic cosmic rays, uncertainty analysis, quality factor, dose-response relationship, low dose rate, Monte Carlo sampling
MeSH terms
Cosmic Radiation, Humans, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced, Space Flight, Mars, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Space Radiation Cancer Risks and Uncertainties for Mars Missions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156%5B0682:srcrau%5D2.0.co;2
The paper
Cucinotta, F. A., Schimmerling, W., Wilson, J. W., Peterson, L. E., Badhwar, G. D., Saganti, P. B., & Dicello, J. F. (2001). Space Radiation Cancer Risks and Uncertainties for Mars Missions. Radiation Research. https://doi.org/10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156%5B0682%3Asrcrau%5D2.0.co%3B2